Hello my friends, today is July 1st. My name is Joseph and this is Markets Weekly. This week we're going to talk about three things. First, we're going to talk about the prospect that the Fed is again behind the curve. Secondly, we'll talk about China's Hidden Foreign Reserves, which may be enormous. And lastly, we'll talk about what's happening with the USD JPI, which appears to be hitting some pretty key levels.
Okay, first, starting with the Fed. Now the big news from my perspective this week was that the third revision of first quarter GDP was again revised higher. It printed at 2%. Now this is interesting to me because it shows that monetary policy so far hasn't really been super effective in slowing down growth. The Fed looks at the world where you have a potential GDP growth and if you're growing faster than your potential GDP growth, that means you're growing above trend and that's inflationary. So a lot of what the Fed has been trying to do over the past year or so has been to slow things down to make sure the economy is growing below trend so that they can get inflation under control.
The Fed thinks that the potential growth for GDP, trend growth is about 1.8%. So at 2% growth, first quarter of this year, the economy continues to grow above trend despite the Fed's efforts to slow it down. So this tells me that whatever the Fed is doing, it's not working as well as they thought and we've talked about that before. They show that in their projections.
Now this past week, there's also this new financial index that was revealed by the Fed. In this financial index, these economists from the Fed give you a view of how they're looking at financial conditions, whether or not they're tight, whether or not they're loose and what the impact on growth will be. According to this new financial index, financial conditions are tightening and it's slowing growth. Now I make this point because this is very different from the other financial conditions indexes.
How in financial indexes like those published by Goldman Sachs or the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago actually show that financial conditions are kind of loose. And when you look at that plus the actual economic data, you have to come to the conclusion that the Fed, the things are not, the world is not behaving the way the Fed thinks it is and the Fed might be behind the curve a bit. Now there's a lot of people at the Fed who think that monetary policy takes time to work through the economy. There's a lag here and you have tons of people on Twitter who are talking about recession is imminent, it's coming, it's coming and those people have been saying the same thing for over a year now.
像高盛(Goldman Sachs)或芝加哥联邦储备银行(Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago)发布的金融指数实际上显示金融条件相对宽松。当你结合实际经济数据观察这种情况时,不得不得出结论,即美联储(Fed)认为的世界并非如其所想,而且美联储可能稍微落后了一点。现在,美联储有很多人认为,货币政策需要时间才能影响经济。这里存在滞后,而在推特上有很多人在谈论不可避免的经济衰退,他们已经说了一年多了。
But when I look at the data, I'm getting the sense that the recession occurred and now we're actually re-accelerating again. So this is how I look at this. If you had financial conditions that were tight, you'd expect at least minimum expect two things. You would expect that sectors that are really interest rate sensitive like housing to slow down and you would expect financial assets to do poorly.
Now let's start with housing. Now last year, as you know, the Fed tightened and housing took a dive. You had house prices go down, more juris go up, a lot of people were complaining on the internet about this. But when you look at the data, it looks like house prices stabilized in the first quarter of this year and began to re-accelerate. If you look at housing starts, which is a leading indicator showing how much new construction is being started, it went down a lot last year in line with higher mortgage rates and all that stabilized and is now rocketing higher again.
So it seems like the tight financial conditions had an impact, the economy shook it off and continues to accelerate again. And now let's look at financial asset prices. Last year, obviously, it was a bad year for both stocks and bonds. This year, it seems like stocks only go up. Actually, it seems really concerning to me. So if financial conditions were really tight, I don't think you'd expect stocks to go up every single day.
So now if the Fed is looking at this new index, thinking that we're tight, but then economic data suggests otherwise, other financial conditions suggest otherwise. I think we're in a situation where the Fed is again, behind the curve, and they might be forced to catch up a bit. So I know they penciled in two more rate hikes by the end of this year. I think there's upside risk to that. And I think from what I'm watching the price action this past week, there's a little bit of indication that the bond market is becoming to realize that the Fed doesn't have things under control. And we might see yields kind of steadily move up again. It looks like they've been consolidating. But as you guys, if you follow me enough, you know that my view is that yields are going to trend higher for these coming years. And we should be above 4% by the end of the year.
Okay, let's talk about the next topic. So the next topic has to do with China's Fawn Reserves. It's based on this piece by Brad Setzer, who is one of the world's foremost experts on these flows in China in particular on their Fawn Reserves. So let's give a little bit of background first, just what is a Fawn Reserve? So let's suppose that you're China.
China is the workshop of the world, and they sell a ton of stuff to countries all over the world, not just the US, but to Europe and to other countries as well. And so they make a whole lot of money, money denominated in foreign currency, like dollars. So they usually keep these dollars, so you know, again, they're selling a lot more than they're buying from abroad. So they're accumulating a lot of foreign currency, a lot of dollars. And they usually keep this in what's called a Fawn Reserves fund. It's held by the People's Bank of China. It's like they're running a fund that they can use to, for example, lend to their commercial banks when they need dollars or maybe stabilize their currency.
So China uses a quasi fixed floating soft peg. And so at times the central bank of China intervenes to to steady the currency there. Now here's a curious thing. China continues to sell tremendous amounts of stuff to the world, continues to earn lots of foreign currency. But if you look at official data on their foreign currency reserves, it's been plateaued around $3 trillion for the past few years. Oftentimes, so just another point, so these foreign reserves are usually held in sovereign debt. So if you oftentimes hear about China being a very large holder of treasuries, or at least agency MBS, it's because they have over $3 trillion in foreign reserves. The exact breakdown of that is a state secret, but it's commonly thought that maybe around half of that is in dollars and among the dollars, a lot of it is held in stuff like treasuries and agency MBS, which have no credit risk. Now how do you resolve this puzzle where you have continually have a current account surplus, but your farm reserves are not growing?
So Brad takes a look into the data and finds that, you know, if you're China, you can actually do a lot of things to kind of quote unquote hide your farm reserves. This is because in China, the government basically controls everything. So for example, one of the ways the government can go about, you know, hiding its foreign reserves is to put them in the commercial banking sector. So what Brad sees is that if you look at the data of the large commercial banks in China, which are of course controlled by the government, you'll see that they hold tremendous amounts of foreign currency assets. So one possibility is that the People's Bank of China gets all these dollars from trade, but instead of putting them in their foreign reserves, they're putting them in the commercial banking sector. So it doesn't show up in their foreign reserve funds. And you can see that in the data. It seems like the foreign currency asset holdings of the commercial banks continue to increase.
Now the second thing you can do is you can put it in these policy banks or, you know, lend it to other people. Now we've all heard of China's Belt and Road Initiative, where China goes around to developing countries, let's say countries in Africa and lends them a whole bunch of money to go and build bridges and stuff like that. Now one curious thing is that these loans are actually in dollars. So you can think of it as China having a whole bunch of dollars, but instead of just putting them into Treasury securities, they funnel them into these policy banks, these initiatives, like the Belt and Road Initiative, and then go and lend them to other countries. It doesn't show up in China's foreign reserves, but it's basically held in another form.
Now Brad finds that if you look at all this, the actual foreign reserves that China holds can be twice as high as the three trillion we see in the data. So maybe six trillion dollars worth of foreign reserves, and that's absolutely enormous. And that has implications with how we think about what China might be invested in and whether or not there's a potential for financial distress in the Chinese economy.
Now over the past few months, we've seen that the Chinese currency continually depreciate against the dollar. And there have been some concerns that maybe China's growth is really not good. There's financial instability. And so maybe the country might lose control of their currency since everyone wants to get money out of the country. So selling R&B and buying dollars or something like that.
Now if China actually has six trillion dollars in foreign reserves, there's really absolutely no worry about this. Six trillion dollars is enormous and they can easily manage any outflows. And of course, in addition to that, they also have capital controls that is to say they can forbid anyone inside the country from taking money out. So it seems like China is in terms of these current account stuff, it is pretty rock solid. There's really no concern of an outflow or some kind of balance of payment crisis, which was kind of silly to begin with.
And I think it's also worth noting that this is kind of a huge political problem for China because as we know from the episode with Russia that if a country behaves in a way that makes the US unhappy, the US can ultimately freeze their foreign reserves effectively confiscating it. So Russia had some money in treasuries and in dollars, but then after the sanctions, they lost access to all of that. And there's even some news that suggests that maybe the Western countries would take that money and give it to Ukraine.
Now if you're China and you have $6 trillion and maybe you're not the best friends with the US, well, that's a huge problem. That kind of gives the US a lot of leverage over you because if you behave in a way that the US does not like, well, maybe they'll freeze all that assets and that's a lot to lose. So I think there's going to be added urgency for China to try to get out of this somehow and it's not easy.
Okay. The last thing we'll talk about, it's what's happening with the USD JPY. So USD JPY obviously the exchange rate, how many yen it takes to buy a dollar has been steadily, the yen has been depreciating against the dollar. So USD JPY has been rocketing higher and it's easy to see why. So again, throughout the world, insurance have been rising steadily, fed is at 5% bank of Japan, still at negative percent. Actually they haven't raised interest rates at all. There's been a lot of speculation from the investor community thinking that, you know, Japan inflation is above their target, maybe they're going to be raising rates soon or at least get out of yield curve control.
Now we just heard their new governor, we don't talk this past week at Centro and he says that that's basically not going to happen. Senator Weta, when it comes to the inflation path for you, I mean I know you'd like to see it continue to rise from here, right? What would it take for you to really strongly consider abandoning the yield curve control and negative rates?
So we have a forecast projection of inflation path that looks like it's going to go down for a while toward the end of this year on declines in import prices and it's spread over to domestic prices. And from there on we are forecasting some increase in the rate of inflation into 24. But we are less confident about the second part. If we become reasonable issue about the second part is going to happen, that could be a good reason for a policy change. If you see a steady increase.
And I also note that this is the first time I heard the new governor speak and he speaks English well, it has a pretty good sense of humor. This joke was my highlight. Governor Weta, do you worry about the impact, the lag impacts of their policies on the global economy and on your economy? Oh yes, but for ourselves, we haven't had any serious monetary tightening for three decades. I was a board member of the BLJ 25 years ago. Then the policy rate was about 20, 30 basis points. Now minus 10 basis points. And it doesn't sound like it's changing any time soon. So in terms of that, the lag and the effects of monetary policy could be at least 25 years. So monetary policy could take a long time to work. So Governor Weta is basically saying that inflation is transitory, so I'm not going to do anything about this.
我还要注意到这是我第一次听到新州长讲话,他的英语说得很好,具有相当不错的幽默感。这个笑话让我印象深刻。韦塔州长,您是否担心他们的政策对全球经济和您的经济产生滞后影响?哦,是的,但是就我们自身而言,三十年来我们没有进行严格的货币紧缩政策。我在25年前是B L J的董事会成员。那时的政策利率大约是20、30个基点。而现在是负10个基点。而且听起来它似乎不会在短期内改变。所以从这一方面来看,货币政策的滞后和影响可能至少需要25年。因此货币政策可能需要很长时间才能发挥作用。所以韦塔州长基本上是在说通货膨胀是短暂的,所以我对此不会采取任何行动。
Now this may sound like a green light for the yen to continue to depreciate against the dollar as it has been. But we're also approaching levels where in the past the Ministry of Finance in Japan, who is the organization that actually controls the currency, is trying to slow it down and might intervene. So the way that they were intervened, of course, is that they will sell dollars and buy yen. So that makes the currency stronger. Now the last time they did this, it led for the, it led the currency pair to basically stop in its tracks and reverse. So as we approach this level, we want to focus on whether or not this, this intervention will happen again.
It's usually not enough to make a difference for the yields.
通常来说,这通常无法对产量产生足够的影响。
The second thing that's more interesting is that usually a UFC JPI is like an overall risk indicator in the markets.
更有趣的第二个事情是,通常情况下,UFC JPI在市场上充当整体风险指标。
If you look at what's happening over the past few months, no, yen depreciates, nasa goes higher. This is a relationship that we've seen on and off over the past few years.
So if you have the yen, again, stopped and strengthening that is to say reversing its trend, UFC JPI going lower, you could see that being a pullback for the risk asset markets as well.