the the kind introduction and i want to start by thanking president micron for hosting the event and of course for the lovely dinner last night during the dinner president micron looked at me and asked if i would like to speak and i said mister president i'm here for the for the good company and free wine but i have to earn my keep today and i of course want to thank prime minister mody for being here and for co hosting the summit for all of you for participating and i'm not here this morning to talk about a i safety which was the title of the conference a couple of years ago i'm here to talk about a i opportunity when conferences like this convene to discuss a cutting edge technology oftentimes i think our responses to be too self conscious to risk averse but never have i encountered a breakthrough in tech that so clearly calls us to do precisely the opposite.
Our administration the trump administration believes that ai will have countless revolutionary applications and economic innovation, job creation, national security, health care, free expression and beyond. And to restrict its development now will not only unfairly benefit incumbents in the space it would mean paralyzing one of the most promising technologies we have seen in generations. Now with that in mind i'd like to make four main points today. Number one this administration will ensure that american ai technology continues to be the gold standard worldwide and we're the partner of choice for others for countries and certainly businesses as they expand their own use of ai. Number two we believe that excessive regulation of the ai sector could kill a transformative industry just as it's taking off and will make every effort to encourage pro-grade growth ai policies and i like to see that regulatory flavor making its way into a lot of the conversations this conference.
Number three we feel very strongly that ai must remain free from ideological bias and that american ai will not be co-opted into a tool for authoritarian censorship. And finally number four the trump administration will maintain a pro-worker that will be a pro-grade growth path for ai. So it can be a potent tool for job creation in the united states and i appreciate prime minister mody's point ai i really believe will facilitate and make people more productive it is not going to replace human beings it will never replace human beings and i think too many of the leaders in the ai industry when they talk about this fear of replacing workers i think they really miss the point ai we believe is going to make us more prosperous and more free.
The united states of america is the leader in ai in our administration plans to keep it that way. The u.s. possesses all components across the full ai stack including advanced semiconductor design frontier algorithms and of course transformational applications. Now the computing power this stack requires is integral to advancing ai technology and to safeguard america's advantage the trump administration will ensure that the most powerful ai systems are built in the u.s. with american designed and manufactured chips. Now just because we're the leader doesn't mean we want to or need to go it alone of course and let me be emphatic about this point.
America wants to partner with all of you and we want to embark on the ai revolution before us with the spirit of openness and collaboration but to create that kind of trust we need international regulatory regimes that fosters the creation of ai technology rather than strangles it and we need our european friends in particular to look to this new frontier with optimism rather than trepidation. Now the development of cutting edge ai in the u.s. is no accident by preserving an open regulatory environment we've encouraged american innovators to experiment and to make unparalleled r and d investments of the 700 billion dollars give or take it's estimated to be spent on ai in 2028 over half of it will likely be invested in the united states of america.
Now this administration will not be the one to snuff out the start ups and the grad students producing some of the most groundbreaking applications of artificial intelligence. Instead our laws will keep big tech, little tech and all other developers on a level playing field. Now the president's recent executive order on ai we're developing an ai action plan that avoids an overly precautionary regulatory regime while ensuring that all americans benefit from the technology and it's transformative potential. Now we invite your countries to work with us and to follow that model if it makes sense for your nation. However the trump administration is trouble by reports that some foreign governments are considering tightening the screws on u.s. tech companies with international footprints.
Now america cannot and will not accept that and we think it's a terrible mistake not just for the united states of america but for your countries. The u.s. innovators of all sizes already know what it's like to deal with ownerist international rules. Many of our most productive tech companies are forced to deal with the e-use digital services act and the massive regulations it created about taking down content and policing so-called misinformation. And of course we want to ensure the internet is a safe place but it is one thing to prevent a predator from praying on a child on the internet and it is something quite different to prevent a grown man or woman from accessing an opinion that the government thinks is misinformation. Meanwhile for smaller firms navigating the GDPR means paying endless legal compliance costs or otherwise risking massive fines. Now for some the easiest way to avoid the dilemma has been to simply block EU users in the first place. Is this really the future that we want ladies and gentlemen I think the answer for all of us should be no.
There is no issue where we worry about more than regulation when it comes to energy. And again I appreciated the comments of so many at the conference because they recognize that we can't we stand now at the frontier of an AI industry that is hungry for reliable power and high quality semiconductors. Yet too many of our friends are deindustrializing on the one hand and chasing reliable power out of their nations and off their grids with the other. The AI future is not going to be one by hand-ringing about safety it will be one by building from reliable power plants to the manufacturing facilities that can produce the chips of the future. Now at a personal level what excites me most about AI is that it is grounded in the real and the physical economy. The success of the sector isn't just a matter of smart people sitting in front of a computer screen and coding it depends on those who work with their hands even as robotics will change our factories. It will certainly make our health care providers better at treating diseases but it will also depend on the data produced by those health care providers by those doctors and nurses.
I believe it will help us create and store new modes of power in the future but right now AI cannot take off unless the world builds the energy infrastructure to support it. Now it's my view that tech innovation over the last 20 years has often conjured images of smart people staring at computer screens engineering in the world of bits but the AI economy will primarily depend on and transform the world of atoms. Now at this moment we face the extraordinary prospect of a new industrial revolution one on par with the invention of the steam engine or Bessemer steel but it will never come to pass if over regulation deters innovators from taking the risks necessary to advance the ball nor will it occur if we allow AI to become dominated by massive players looking to use the tech to center or control user's thoughts. And I'd ask if you step back a moment and ask yourself who was most aggressively demanding that we meaning political leaders gathered here today do the most aggressive regulation it is very often the people who already have an incumbent advantage in the market and when a massive incumbent comes to us asking us for safety regulations we ought to ask whether that safety regulation is for the benefit of our people or whether it's for the benefit of the incumbent.
Now over the last few years we've watched as governments businesses and nonprofit organizations have advanced unpopular and I believe downright ahistorical social agendas through AI. In the US we had AI image generators trying to tell us that George Washington was black or that America's doe boys in World War I were in fact women. Now we laugh at this now and of course it was ridiculous but we have to remember the lessons from that ridiculous moment and what we take from it is that the Trump administration will ensure that AI systems developed in America are free from ideological bias and never restrict our citizens right to free speech. We can trust our people to think to consume information to develop their own ideas and to debate with one another in the open marketplace of ideas.
Now we've also watched as hostile foreign adversaries have weaponized AI software to rewrite history, surveil users and censor speech. This is hardly new of course. As they do with other tech some authoritarian regimes have stolen and used AI to strengthen their military intelligence and surveillance capabilities, capture foreign data and create propaganda to undermine other nations and to protect their own security. I want to be clear this administration will block such efforts full stop. We will safeguard American AI and chip technologies from theft and misuse, work with our allies and partners to strengthen and extend these protections and close pathways to advert areas attaining AI capabilities that threaten all of our people.
And I would also remind our international friends here today that partnering with such regimes it never pays off in the long term. From CCTV to 5G equipment we're all familiar with cheap tech in the marketplace that's been heavily subsidized and exported by authoritarian regimes. But as I know and I think some of this some of us in this room have learned from experience partnering within means chaining your information to an authoritarian master that seeks to infiltrate, dig in and seize your information infrastructure. Should a deal seem too good to be true? Just remember the old adage that we learned in Silicon Valley if you aren't paying for the product you are the product.
Finally this administration wants to be very clear about one last point. We will always center American workers in our country to make sure that they are not going to be able to do that by policy. We refuse to view AI as a purely disruptive technology that will inevitably automate away our labor force. We believe and we will fight for policies that ensure that AI is going to make our workers more productive and we expect that they will reap the rewards with higher wages, better benefits and safer and more effective. Manufacturing the most immediate applications of AI almost all involve supplementing, not replacing the work being done by Americans.
Now combined with this administration's worker first approach to immigration, we believe that the US labor force prepared to use AI to its fullest extent will instead attract the attention of businesses that have offshored some of these things. To accomplish this the administration will make sure that America has the best trained workforce in the world. Our schools will teach students how to manage, how to supervise and how to interact with AI enabled tools as they become more and more part of our everyday lives. And as AI creates new jobs and industries, our government, businesses and labor organizations have an obligation to work together to empower the workers, not just in the United States, but all over the country, all over the world.
To that end, for all major AI policy decisions coming from the federal government, the Trump administration will guarantee American workers a seat at the table and we're very proud of that. Now I've taken up enough of your time so I'd like to close with just a quick story. This is a beautiful country, President Macron, and I know that you're proud of it and should be. And yesterday as I was touring, lay in the lead with General Gravette with my three kids, he was kind enough to show me the sword that belonged to America's dearest international friend from our own revolution, of course, the Marquis de Lafayette.
为了实现这一目标,对于来自联邦政府的所有重大 AI 政策决策,特朗普政府将确保美国工人有发言权,我们对此感到非常自豪。现在我已经占用了你们不少时间,所以我想用一个简短的故事来结束。马克龙总统,这是一个美丽的国家,我知道你为此感到自豪,也是应该的。昨天,当我带着三个孩子与格拉维特将军一起参观时,他非常友好地向我展示了一把剑,这把剑属于我们革命时期美国最亲密的国际朋友,当然就是拉法叶侯爵。
He let me hold the sword, but of course he made me put on the white gloves beforehand. And it got me thinking of this country, France, and of course of my own country, and of the beautiful civilization that we have built together with weapons like that saber. Weapons that are dangerous in the wrong hands, but are incredible tools for liberty and prosperity in the right hands. I couldn't help but think of the conference today. If we choose the wrong approach on other things that could be conceived of as dangerous, things like AI, and choose to hold ourselves back, it will alter not only our GDP or the stock market, but the very future of the project that Lafayette and the American founders set off to create.
他让我握住那把剑,不过当然他让我先戴上了白手套。这让我想到这个国家,法国,当然也想到我自己的国家,以及我们用那种军刀一起建立的美好文明。武器如果落在不当的人手中是危险的,但在合适的手中,它们是争取自由和繁荣的惊人工具。我忍不住想到了今天的会议。如果我们在处理其他可能被认为是危险的事情(例如人工智能)时选择了错误的方法,选择让自己止步不前,这不仅会影响我们的 GDP 或股市,还会改变拉斐特和美国开国元勋们着手创造的项目的未来。
Now this doesn't mean the course that all concerns about safety go out the window, but focus matters. And we must focus now on the opportunity to catch lightning at a bottle unleash our most brilliant innovators and use AI to improve the well-being of our nations and their peoples. With great confidence, I can say it is an opportunity that the Trump administration will not squander. And we hope everyone convened here today feels exactly the same. Thank you and God bless you all.